WIRECARD TRIAL, 27.11.2025 – I was back in the courtroom again.

What took place today is a judicial scandal in real time.

Witness: KPMG partner Dr. Rainer Thiede.
More than 60 times: “I cannot remember.”

The judge himself takes over the questioning and repeats – sometimes subtly, sometimes bluntly & directly like a broken record: “Braun is guilty. Maybe von Erffa as well. No one else.”

GO MAX – this is not a trial, this is a show trial! 🔥

Fact from the courtroom and evident in the raised documents: Supervisory board chairman Thomas Eichelmann did not provide the documents demanded by KPMG for months – even though he had promised them himself. Pure sabotage.

That Braun's collar burst is now exactly being accused to him by the judge as "pressure on KPMG".

And: KPMG chimes in, witness Thiede naturally does not mention even once that KPMG was involved in several other projects at Wirecard in the years before: risk management, balance sheet and tax audit projects, as well as the scandalous Hermes Deal with EMIF (for which a KPMG consultant was brought in to perfect the questionable deal! https://en.sustainablevalueinvestors.com/2020/10/20/kpmgs-links-to-the-wirecard-scandal/).

Questions about a bias already at the very beginning of the special investigation in 2019 – e.g. by von Erffa – bounce off Thiede like off a Teflon pan: "I cannot remember." Judge: "Next question..."

Trustee change end of 2019/beginning of 2020: Marsalek only lets it slip after hours in the conversation with Thiede. Thiede today: “No big deal, I have no recollection.” Judge: immediately cuts him off, “odd”, but next question.

Instead Thiede: KPMG wanted to examine the TPA partner on site themselves → Wirecard absolutely did not like that and wanted to prevent it. Judge: zero follow-up question, fits the Braun-guilt narrative.

Third-party confirmations Malaysia, Thiede: “The companies do not exist.” They had sent out DHL shipments via the KPMG own network and only then learned that these transactions supposedly “never existed”. Thiede: “The shipments were INTERCEPTED”. Even Oliver Bellenhaus, when questioned, later asks the Dr. KPMG in astonishment: “How did you actually know that the third-party confirmations had been intercepted – was that written on the DHL tracking numbers?”

The 34 Al-Alam phantom traders of the FT?
Judge boldly claims: “They were investigated!”

Reality: KPMG NEVER investigated the companies behind them or their complex fraud structures. Exactly what the defense has been pointing out for years – and what the Munich public prosecutor’s office, partly shouting together with the judge in the courtroom, screams down. Fact: SoKo, Gibson Dunn and others produced a “green list” on which companies were placed if mutual legal assistance requests were successful. Asian companies: not particularly interesting to us.

Data disk drama with Wirecard transactions from the months December 2019 – April 2020: origin never verified – Thiede: “We could only believe it.”

Nevertheless, the supervisory board itself states in the minutes afterwards: “original, genuine data.” KPMG actually adjusted parts of the report under pressure.

Judge: I’m only interested in Braun.

The “evidence” against Braun: alleged threat with “electric chair” + ski cabin invitation for KPMG employee Leitz. That Eichelmann sabotaged for months and Braun therefore freaked out – not a word.

Lingering suspicion: KPMG played along until they were given the green light to suddenly no longer find any trust funds. Shortly after the trustee change.
Marsalek, Bellenhaus, Philippines mafia?

Judge thinks sharply and silently at the display: the public must never find out about this. Next question....

This is no longer a criminal trial.

This is the continuation of the biggest cover-up in German economic history – live in court.

The real masterminds are laughing themselves to death.

Share this. Make it go viral. The public finally has to see what is really going on here.

#Wirecard #Justizskandal

🔥📷🔥