Letter to Cardinal Marx
Letter to Archbishop Reinhard Cardinal Marx following an incident on March 31, 2021, in which the applicant was denied general access to the Munich Cathedral during the Covid period for the most irrational reasons.
DocumentLetter to Catholic Youth Welfare
Explanations that the Munich District Court continues to insist on the involvement of the Catholic Church in the paternity dispute, despite repeated complaints, motions for bias on the part of the judges, mulitple criminal charges against employees of the Munich Youth Welfare Office and the contact supervisor of the children. Requesting the Catholic Youth Welfare Office to inform the local court on its own initiative to refrain from an additional guardianship of the children along with Catholic representatives in order to prevent further escalations.
DocumentLetter from Catholic Youth Welfare Munich
Offer to cooperate in a supplementary guardianship related to a paternity proceeding at the Munich District Court.
DocumentLetter to the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Repeated request to send confirmation of invalidity of marriage.
DocumentLetter from the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Explaining that a certificate of invalidity of marriage can only be issued if a certificate of baptism of the ex-wife would be available, and which had already been submitted the official of the Metropolitan Court.
DocumentLetter to the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Statement and evidence that the ex-wife testified three years ago that she considers the marriage to have failed and that they were not married in church. Request that the recognition of the invalidity of the marriage be sent without delay.
DocumentLetter to the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Explanation that the interpretations of the head of canon law are confused and confused, a baptismal confirmation of the ex-wife was presented which is evidently ignored by the official of the Metropolitan Court.
DocumentLetter from the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Notification that the Cardinal cannot personally sign a certificate because he allegedly "lacks the necessary knowledge". Further explanation that there is nothing to add to the last statements of the official of the Metropolitan Court regarding the invalidity of the marriage.
DocumentLetter to the District Court Munich
Explanation to the court that the Catholic Church is in a state of great confusion at this time, and therefore the involvement of Catholic authorities in a paternity challenge must be rejected.
DocumentLetter to the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Notification that the certificate is not suitable for submission to the Public Prosecutor. Request for a document personally signed by the Cardinal.
DocumentResponse from the Canon Law Department of the Ordinariate of Munich
Letter stating that the Cardinal did not grant permission according to 1172 § 1 CIC and should not have granted permission according to 1172 § 2 CIC, signed by the Congregation for Canon Law.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Request to send confirmation that the Cardinal has not given permission for a so-called “big exorcism” on the ex-wife, which is required for the Public Prosecutor's Office.
DocumentLetter to the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Enclosure of a certificate of baptism of the ex-wife and repeated request for an immediate confirmation of the invalidity of the 3-years divorced marriage.
DocumentFormal withdrawal from the Catholic Church of Munich and Freising
Formal resignation from the Catholic Church of Munich and Freising at the District Office of Munich, exclusively as a result of the incidents listed below.
DocumentLetter to the Official of the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Explanation that a baptismal certificate was presented several times by the ex-wife, therefore the marriage must be recognized as invalid.
DocumentLetter from the official of the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Statements after alleged "investigations" about and with the ex-wife. The following is stated: "However, a church marriage with a woman other than the previous wife will fail at the latest when the marriage certificate is issued if you cannot provide the above-mentioned proof [confirmation of baptism of the ex-wife]. Then, at the latest, you will be confronted by the marriage minister with the question of the validity of the first marriage". This baptismal certificate of the ex-wife has been presented to the official several times before.
DocumentLetter to the Official of the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Short letter thanking for the letter of May 16, 2017 and stating that the last letter from the Metropolitan Court has apparently confirmed and communicated the invalidity of the marriage.
DocumentLetter from the official of the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Brief response from the official stating that the arguments allegedly contradicted the legal provisions of the Catholic Church and that there are allegedly no grounds for further action by the Metropolitan Court.
DocumentLetter with postage paid envelope to Cardinal Marx
Another request to send confirmation of the nullity of the marriage, enclosing a stamped, self-addressed envelope, in case the Catholic Church in Munich lacks funding to do so.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Forwarding my complaint against the official of May 9, 2017 to Cardinal Marx. Asking the Cardinal to confirm the nullity of the marriage. Announcement that I will have to leave the Catholic Church in the next few weeks due to the catastrophic behavior of the Ordinariate, unless there are other developments.
DocumentLetter to the Official of the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Complaint about the deliberately false and contradictory statements and arguments of the official of the Munich Metropolitan Court in their letter dated May 3, 2017.
DocumentLetter from the official of the ecclesiastical court of Munich and Freising
Multiple, slanderous accusations (e.g. the letters to the Cardinal were allegedly “diffuse”) with deliberately false accusations regarding the previous meeting at the Metropolitan Court. In addition, contradictory and distorted statements of the previously presented facts.
DocumentLetter to a Jesuit priest from St. Michael's Church, Munich
Sending of an overview of the child custody case and requesting an interview. No response, even after an email informing him that if anything happens in the meantime, the priest should inform the police. Attendance at a lecture event in person in mid-April 2017 at the Jesuits in St. Michael's Church in Munich, where the priest is met and another letter is personally handed over to him. No response or feedback after that as well.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Letter to Cardinal Marx with detailed explanations of the incidents during the hearing at the Munich Metropolitan Court a few days earlier. Announcement that further criminal charges may have to be filed as a result.
DocumentAppointment at the Munich Metropolitan Court
Appointment at the Munich Metropolitan Court with partly scandalous happenings.
Letter to the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Statement of the facts concerning the marriage with the Urkainian ex-wife divorced in 2014, resubmission of the grounds for recognizing the invalidity of the marriage.
DocumentLetter from the Metropolitan Court of Munich
Notification of an appointment for a meeting on March 9, 2017 at the Metropolitan Court of Munich.
Letter to Cardinal Marx
Application for recognition of the nullity of the marriage and explanation of the reasons, e.g. that the ex-wife was baptized Orthodox and the marriage should never have been recognized under Catholic law without special procedures.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Forwarding of a complaint to Munich's Public Prosecutor's Office, where criminal charges are still pending against employees of the Munich Youth Welfare Office after an apparent breach of official secrecy by the Office of the Cardinal.
DocumentMessage from the Archiepiscopal Finance Chamber in Munich
Information on possible housing alternatives. According to contact inquiries, there is currently only one 3-room apartment in Munich at approx. 1500 euros per month plus additional costs available.
DocumentResponse from the Head of Diaconia
Information that the request to the Cardinal has been forwarded to the real estate department of the Ordinariate, also reference to the Catholic housing association.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Presenting of the current situation regarding child custody case and the children plus inquiry about alternative living arrangements.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Explanations that there are certainly ways for the Catholic church to be involved in this matter considering their wealth, but that these are not considered by the Head of Diaconia. Also pointing out that the two children are superficially known to the Cardinal as they sometimes passed through the blessings by the Cathedral after mass.
DocumentResponse from the Head of Diaconia
Confirmation of receipt of the letters of May 22 and June 8, 2016 to Cardinal Marx. Affirmation that there is no knowledge of who could have leaked the confidential letter to the Cardinal by employees of Munich's Youth Welfare Office and that there is no possibility of Church representatives attending court hearings.
DocumentCriminal charges for violation of official secrecy §353b
Criminal complaint to the Munich Public Prosecutor's Office against persons unknown for violation of official secrecy §353b regarding the knowledge of employees of the Munich Youth Welfare Office about the confidential letter sent to the Cardinal in July/August 2015 with malicious slander directly at a court hearing in this regard.
DocumentRequest to Cardinal Marx
Notification that a family court hearing is pending. Request whether general support(!) from the church, e.g. legal advice, would be possible, also because of the pending criminal charges and the slander by employees of the Youth Welfare Office.
DocumentLetter to Cardinal Marx
Statement that representatives of the Youth Welfare Office made defamatory, false and intentional statements during a hearing at the Family Court that they would allegedly, quote, "write inflammatory letters against the Youth Welfare Office to the Cardinal". Explanations that criminal charges for breach of official secrecy must be brought against unknown persons in this regard, since the confidential letter to the Cardinal obviously came to the knowledge and possession of employees of the Youth Welfare Office and was used there in a highly defamatory manner.
DocumentLetter to the Head of Diakonie
Explaining that during the exhausting time with the ex-wife, catastrophic conditions with child endangerment occurred and that the Munich courts, the Youth Welfare Office and ex-wife willfully and deliberately intends to get rid of a father for the children.
DocumentResponse from the Head of Diaconia
Statement by Diaconia that "the situation is regrettable". Communication that there is allegedly no possibility of help from the church to be expected in order to influence judicial decisions in any way.
DocumentConfidential letter to Cardinal Marx
Description of the events related to the child custody case before the Munich Family Court in early July 2015. The letter is personally handed over to the then deacon of Munich's Frauenkirche with the orally presented request to personally deliver the document to Cardinal Marx.
Document